The term “public option” is most often associated with health care debates in the United States. But a public option can include any good or service that is publicly owned, available to everyone, and coexists with private options. Public schools, public libraries, and the U.S. Postal Service are all examples of public options that have long existed in the U.S.
Advocates for economic justice have embraced the potential of public options for banks, grocery stores, and more. The reason? The profit-driven private free market often fails to equitably provide basic and essential needs like food, child care, and housing. Public options also offer an opportunity to fill the gaps in availability, distribute ownership and decision-making power across the tax base, and ensure that power is not concentrated among the wealthy few.
During this Q&A, a panel of experts shared their insights on efforts to expand public options of goods and services that center the needs and participation of communities.
- Deyanira Del Río, Co-Director, New Economy Project
- Andy Morrison, Associate Director, New Economy Project
- Udochi Onwubiko, Director of Economic Justice, Demos
- Harish Patel, Vice President, Build the Field, Economic Security Project
Corporate concentration has increased persistently over the past century, channeling power away from people and communities into the hands of the wealthy few and creating competitive disadvantages for smaller, entrepreneurial businesses — especially in Black and brown communities.
During this Q&A, a panel of experts discuss how consolidation in corporate power impacts our everyday lives and examine a range of promising interventions — including modernizing antitrust legislation, restoring agencies’ regulatory and enforcement power, and establishing a more equitable tax code — that can help foster a private sector that works in tandem with a thriving public sector to serve the public good.
Distance between those who set the rules and those who work by, live by, and are impacted by the rules creates an opportunity for distrust, disengagement, and potentially abuse. With the decades-long decline of unions, erosions in regulations supporting employee power, and greater inequality between the compensation of owners and employees, worker influence over and engagement in workplace decisions may be at an all-time low. At the same time, the voice of everyday people is increasingly undermined by the influence of money in our political system. At all levels of government, elected officials face pressures from paid lobbyists representing corporate interests, while people in communities lack both the resources and transparency in the process to weigh in on critical decisions over public resources. Co-governance and shared ownership models allow people to directly participate in decision making at their workplace or in their community.
During this Q&A, a panel of experts share innovative solutions being implemented across the country to counter decades of declining power and engagement among workers and citizens.